Gutfeld on the Times being upset about their exposed tweets

Posted by


>>Greg: ARE YOU TALKING TO ME BEFORE THE MONOLOGUE? ALL RIGHT. “THE NEW YORK TIMES” IS OUTRAGED THAT A TRUMP AFFILIATED GROUP IS EXPOSING OLD TWEETS MADE BY A STAFFER. I AGREE WITH THEIR CONCERN, EXCEPT THAT IF THERE JOURNALISTS TO THE SAME THING TO YOU, THEY CALL IT JOURNALISM. YES, THE MEDIA HASN’T THOUGHT TWICE ABOUT USING WORDS TO CANCEL THE CAREERS OF ANYONE OUTSIDE THEIR POLITICAL WORLD. THEY WILL USE JUST ABOUT ANYTHING THAT BY TODAY’S STANDARDS LOOKS PROBLEMATIC. BUT IT’S HYPOCRISY. THEY CALL IT “SCRUTINIZING PEOPLE IN POSITIONS OF POWER. “SEEKING TO HARASS AND EMBARRASS ANYONE AFFILIATED WITH A LEAD NEWS ORGANIZATION. THEY USE IT AND ABUSE THAT AS THEY SEE FIT, PUSHING ON IDEOLOGY THAT HOLDS YOU IN DISDAIN. THIS SHOULD WORRY ANYONE WHO CARES ABOUT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM. BUT WHY? CERTAINLY, JOURNALISTS SHOULD WELCOME TO SCRUTINY. OR IS THIS THE KIND OF POWER THAT THEY HATE? MAYBE IT’S TIME TO GET THE GANDER WHAT THEY’VE BEEN DOING TO THE GOOSE. TARGETING THEM WHAT WITH WH TARGETING THEM WHAT WITH WT TARGETING THEM WHAT WITH WE TARGETING THEM WHAT WITH W’ TARGETING THEM WHAT WITH WE BEEN DOING. MAYBE THAT FORGIVENESS SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ALL OF US, NOT JUST THOSE WORKING AT THE TIMES. YOU KNOW, PETE I HATE THIS STUFF. I HATE GOING AFTER PEOPLE FOR THEIR LITTLE TWEETS AND STUFF THAT THEY DID TEN YEARS AGO. I THINK IT’S GROSS HOW THEY CANCEL PEOPLE. I WOULD RATHER JUST HAVE A BLANKET, LET’S FORGIVE EVERYBODY. BUT WE CAN ONLY GET THERE IF WE DO THIS. IF WE HAVE THE JOURNALISTS FEEL THE PAIN.>>Pete: YOU, I’M WITH YOU ALL THE WAY. WHAT I SAID 5-10 YEARS AGO. YOU LIVE A DIFFERENT LIFE. THERE IS CONTEXT TO EVERYTHING.>>Greg: YOU WERE HORRIBLE BACK THEN.>>Pete: YOU PROBABLY WILL. BUT YOU ARE RIGHT. UNTIL THE DOUBLE STANDARD IS GONE, YOU CAN’T GET TO THAT ZERO SPOT. THE MEDIA, THEY ALWAYS GIVE THEMSELVES A FANCY NICKNAME TO HOLD UP THEIR PILLAR OF SOCIETY. THEY PUT FRAMED POLITICAL ISSUES IN OUR COUNTRY. THE TIMES BASICALLY EXPOSED JOURNALISM. I LOVE THIS EFFORT. SEND IT RIGHT BACK AT THOSE JOURNALISTS WHO STAND ON THEIR MORAL HIGH GROUND AND PRETEND THAT THEY ARE THE JUDGE AND JURY OF EVERYONE ELSE WHO JUMPS ON THEIR WAY.>>Greg: I LOVE IT. YOU KNOW, ONE, IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THEIR MESSAGE IS THAT JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE S JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE O JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE E JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE A JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE O JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE R JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE N JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE T JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE E JOURNALISTS CAN RUIN LIVES, WE R LIVES TO.>>Juan: I AGREE WITH YOU, BUT I JUST THINK OF THE CONTEXT HERE IS OFF. I THINK THAT WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT HERE IS, ARE YOU HARASSING JOURNALISTS? ARE YOU TRYING TO INTIMIDATE JOURNALISTS QUESTION RIGHT>>Greg: THESE ARE PUBLIC TWEETS. SEE FIVE WELL, THEY ARE PUBLIC. HE’S THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. PEOPLE LOOK AT SOMEONE WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. HA, THERE’S A REASON FOR DOING THIS. BUT IF YOU ARE SAYING, LOOK, I THINK THE TIMES EDITOR SAID SOMETHING AWFUL IN A BAR TO A WOMAN. I THINK THAT’S A LEVEL THAT’S INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE AND HARASS.>>Greg: I TOLD YOU I’D STOP.>>Juan: I SAY. C. THIS IS ABOUT HARASSING CONSERVATIVES. THAT’S A LIMITED VIEW OF THE IDEA. YOU HAD A REAL ARGUMENT, WHICH IS WELL, IF IT’S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE, IT’S GOOD FOR THE GANDER. NOW IT’S AN IDEOLOGICAL THING.>>Greg: THE GANDER IS THE CONSERVATIVE, AND THE GOOSE IS A LIBERAL.>>Juan: HE WANTS TO COOK ANOTHER GOOSE.>>Greg: I’M TIRED OF BEING GOOSED. REMEMBER WHEN CNN WENT AFTER THAT WOMAN BECAUSE SHE RETWEETED A RUSSIAN BOT? HE HAD A MEME WITH THAT WAS PUSHING AROUND.>>Dana: THE GUY LOST HIS JOB.>>Greg: YEAH, THE GUY LOST HIS JOB.>>Emily: THE FREE PRESS, THE CONCEPT OF IT, ABSOLUTELY IS SACRED. SO SHOULD NEUTRALITY. SO IS CREDIBILITY. WE SHOULD ABSOLUTELY HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE, BECAUSE WHY SHOULD I TAKE AS CREDIBLE OR NEUTRAL, THE SENIOR EDITOR WHO SENT OUT ANTI-SEMITIC TWEETS? I WAS SO UNCOMFORTABLE READING THIS. FOR ME, I DON’T THINK THERE’S ANY ROOM FOR A LACK OF THAT CULPABILITY, CALLING SOMEONE OUT. IT’S NOT HARASSMENT IF YOU ARE SHOWING SOMEONE WHAT THEY DID. THEY ARE EXPECTING YOU TO RELY ON THEM TO ACCURATELY COVER OUR GOVERNMENT AND OUR POLITICS. TO ME, THAT’S THE DISCONNECT. SEE FIVE I THINK THAT’S FAIR, BUT I WOULD SAY THAT WHAT WOULD THEY ARE DOING IS PUTTING OUT JOURNALISM. YOU SHOULD JUDGE THEIR JOURNALISM OR JOURNALISM OR SO.>>Greg: THAT SHOULD APPLY TO EVERYONE, DANA. CORRECT?>>Dana: CORRECT.>>Greg: THANK YOU.>>Dana: EVERYONE GETS A CHOICE ABOUT WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO PUT ON SOCIAL MEDIA. THINK ABOUT IT. IF YOU DECIDE, YOU CAN DECIDE TO HAVE SOMETHING ON TWITTER OR FACEBOOK OR WHATEVER THAT DOESN’T HAVE TO DO WITH VOICING YOUR OPINION THAT ARE GOING TO COME BACK AND HURT YOU LATER. YOU CAN PROMOTE THINGS, RETWEET FUNNY THINGS. YOU DON’T HAVE TO ALWAYS COMMENT ON EVERY –>>Greg: BUT THE THING IS, WHAT GOT THIS GUY INTO TROUBLE AND WHAT GETS EVERYONE INTO TROUBLE IS EDGY HUMOR. THE WHOLE POINT OF IT BEING OFFENSIVE IS –>>Dana: BUT PEOPLE HAVE LOST THEIR ENTIRE LIVELIHOODS. THAT’S WHEN I SAY, REMEMBER THE WOMAN WHO WAS FROM TENNESSEE. A CONGRESSWOMAN. SHE COMMENTED THAT SHE THOUGHT THAT THE DAUGHTERS OF OBAMA, THEIR OUTFITS WERE NOT

57 comments

  1. What concerns me more than anything right now is that we as Americans will become so desensitized to what is right and what is wrong that we just won't care anymore. Jesus taught us "he who is without sin can cast the first stone". This is a classic example of somebody throwing stones and all of a sudden are discovered that they are just as dirty as the ones that they have accused. News organizations need to be in the business of informing the public based on the truth and not creating a story just for ratings and making money.

  2. but this is exactly what these woke wackaloons do to everyone else lol what goes around comes around.

  3. "What makes up the free press?" 2001? "Journalists", 2019: Everybody in the world. Give up the ghost folks. We are tired of the listening to your version of the truth the money behind you wants us to hear.

  4. The Unicorn coffee mug destroys the credibility of most of what you say. Maybe that's the point… Mockery in a most vile and immature display. Now I can see why FOX pays you the big bucks.

  5. Media has been doing this since Paula Dean (the original test case) was thrown under the bus so successfully, for something she said in the privacy of her home 20 years before.

  6. Juan, why do you constantly applaud the attacks on Conservatives while treating simply returning the favor as harassment? Your voice is about enough to make me stop watching this show, you have nothing but hypocritical and contradicting statements depending on which side you talk about. It's fine when democrats do it, but when it's coming from the other side it is usually racist, sexist, or whatever else fabricated word of the day you can come up with.

  7. Who knows what´s "offensive" ten years from now? Maybe the question mark, "?" is a symbol cannibal communists whom everyone hates, because they try to solve overpopulation by eating random people. Media then checks out all the people who ever used "?" and saying they are cannibal communists, and they must go to prison. Right? ? ? ?

  8. The Five has become a useless comedy show with no intent to deliver news to the effect of resolving issues. Gutfeld is a clown and they are all scripted to laugh around the issues. Pathetic.

  9. How did Juan bring Trump into this one? That man has some serious TDS. I wonder how many times he says Trump on this show per week?

  10. Juan, what about the meme maker, the forklift driver, the high school kids, (no truth to power there) which the leftest MSM attacked !

  11. So y'all must be pretty snegged off, all in the same power yellow, with a marksman in the middle, holding a HUGE pen . . . . .

    LoL

  12. Juan: Context shifts over time. Someone read that tweet in 2 weeks might understand it, but 20 years… Forget about it.
    Also Juan: Our forefathers weren’t great because they had slaves… Over 200 years ago.

  13. Juan, you are the biggest TRAITOR!! You make so disgusted with all Juan and your day Is coming , leave the dark side and pray for your forgiveness! You been a bad bad boy!

  14. Your just a small voice in the Focks money machine playing both sides and calling it balanced.
    If you had any balls at all you would punch juan in his commie arse lick ugly face and go flip burgers..

  15. No news organization in history have EVER been objective. From day one in the United States, have been biased, prejudiced and often will color the facts to fit their various objectives. Thomas Jefferson literally had a newspaper begun to do nothing but criticize Washington and Adams. There is no such thing as an objective media, and there never will be.

  16. They do it to politicians and the public all the time. But considered bad form when it comes to them being called out? Hypocrites

  17. None of them are journalists! They are activist doing hut jobs and are the epitome of hypocritical and biased. Zero Neutrality and Zero Credibility and ALL PROPAGANDA! Fake news would be putting it gently.

  18. Only Journalist care about Journalists… The rest of the world views them as opinionated and biased, never telling the entire story except the point of view they want displayed. I literally have to get my news from about 6 or 7 sources so I can get make up my own mind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *